Alcosensor IV and mouth alcohol - open containers lead to DUI arrests in Georgia

August 15th, 2006 Rob Leonard Posted in PC for arrest, PBT's No Comments »

I was playing with my new Alcosensor IV from Intoximeters, Inc..  It is Georgia’s portable breath tester of choice.  I found that the “mouth alcohol” (residual alcohol from having recently taken a drink) lasts much longer than I would have thought.  My drink of beer had me over the legal limit for almost five minutes and wasn’t back down to where it ought to be for a good fifteen minutes.

The significance of this is huge when we are talking about a police officer’s formulation of his decision to arrest.  Don’t think for a second that the number on the alcosensor isn’t what drives arrests.  When a citizen is literally drinking and driving with an open container in the car, chances are that they will blow a high number on the Alcosensor if they agree to blow.  This reading will be inflated and not reflective of their true BAC.  This is a bad problem with officers that administer the Alcosensor prior to the SFST’s.  He becomes biased and loses all objectivity in grading and scoring the SFST’s. 

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Portable Breath Test : the Alco-Sensor

August 6th, 2006 Allen Trapp Posted in Breath Tests, PBT's No Comments »

The PBT is recommended for use after the field sobriety tests, although an officer will frequently employ before other FST’s, which fundamentally prejudices his evaluation of the other tests. Administration of the PBT after the other field sobriety tests (FST’s) also helps the officer comply with an industry recommended 15 minute deprivation time period. The Alcosensor IV operating manual specifically recommends a 15 minute waiting period. However, officers frequently ignore this recommendation and direct motorists to blow into a PBT before the administration of other FST’s.

In the 1980’s PBTs were (in many States) originally intended to be used after the FST’s to ensure the officer is working with an alcohol issue as opposed to drugs or a diabetic condition (Qualification not Quantification). Over the course of time in many states the PBT result has become admissible evidence (Qualification and now Quantification). But, the PBT is not accurate for determining BrAC. Carry over effect, lack of mouth alcohol detection, improper deprivation period, lack of calibration maintenance, and fuel cell maintenance are some of the top issues in cases involving a PBT. On the Alcosensor, the calibration adjustment screw is exposed on the side of the unit and assessable to the operator. The unit even comes with its own mini screwdriver to adjust the value up or down. Georgia allows any police officer to administer a PBT, and any of them can adjust the calibration of a PBT.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button